Skip to main content

New story in Health from Time: How Long Will the Coronavirus Outbreak Last? Experts Are Scrambling to Find Out



As a novel coronavirus known as 2019-nCoV continues to spread throughout China and to countries across the world, the big question is: How long will the outbreak last—and how bad will it get?

While some doctors have made predictions and outbreaks of similar coronaviruses like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) provide clues, the short, if unsatisfying, answer is that no one is exactly sure.

“There is no scientist nor sage on the planet that will tell you when the peak of this epidemic will occur,” said Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the World Health Organization’s health emergencies program, at a press conference Wednesday. “The peak will occur when the peak occurs.”

Nonetheless, research is moving forward. Here’s what scientists know so far.

How does 2019-nCoV compare to other coronaviruses?

The novel coronavirus, which was first found in Wuhan, China, is not identical to either SARS or MERS, but the viruses cause some similar symptoms, including cough, fever and trouble breathing, which sometimes progresses to serious respiratory distress. A study published in the Lancet on Wednesday, which examined the genomes of nine patients with 2019-nCoV, found that the virus shares the vast majority of its genetic makeup with viruses similar to SARS that originated in bats, suggesting that 2019-nCoV may have come from bats before spreading to an intermediary animal host and then to people.

Dr. Trish Perl, chief of infectious diseases and geographic medicine at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, says 2019-nCoV does seem to be spreading more quickly than SARS. Research published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, based on the first 425 confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan, found that the number of infected people doubled in size roughly every week in the outbreak’s first few weeks.

In the short time since the virus was discovered, the number of confirmed cases in mainland China—7,678 as of 9 AM eastern time Thursday—has surpassed the number seen during the roughly six-month-long SARS outbreak, which sickened 5,237 people in China and more than 8,000 worldwide.

SARS killed about 10% of the people who contracted it. While it’s too soon to say what the mortality rate for 2019-nCoV will be, Perl says she is “hopeful” that it will be fairly low, given early data. So far, there have been 170 confirmed deaths, which makes the mortality rate roughly 2%.

Despite the viruses’ similarities, however, Perl says the world is very different today than it was nearly two decades ago, during the SARS outbreak. “Eighteen years ago, the infrastructure and the travel into China was much less,” Perl says. “How does a much more sophisticated infrastructure, all these global flights going in day in and day out, how has that factored into all of this?”

Even with travel halted in and out of Wuhan and travel restrictions in place throughout China, Perl says globalization may change the game—especially since the virus was already circulating when the bans went into effect.

How does 2019-nCoV spread?

While research into nearly every facet of the virus is ongoing, scientists are starting to learn more.

Researchers initially traced 2019-nCoV to a meat and seafood market in Wuhan, suggesting that it spread via animal vectors rather than human contact. Human-to-human transmission was confirmed later. The NEJM paper says 55% of people who got sick before Jan. 1, 2020 had visited the market, while only about 9% of those who got sick later had—suggesting it is now spreading through people, though it’s not entirely clear how.

“The main parameter we really need to understand to get a better estimate is whether this is infectious in the asymptomatic state,” says Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, director of the division of infectious diseases at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Neither SARS nor MERS were, “so let’s hope this virus behaves true to form,” Marrazzo says. Diseases that spread asymptomatically are harder to contain, since people may unwittingly pass them on by traveling or attending public events. CDC officials have said there’s no clear evidence that an infected person can spread 2019-nCoV before symptoms appear, although some reports out of China have suggested otherwise.

2019-nCoV appears to be transmitted via respiratory droplets and close contact, rather than germs lingering on surfaces or moving through the air, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials said on a Jan. 27 call with reporters.

The novel virus appears to have an average incubation period—meaning the time between exposure and symptom onset—of about five days, according to the NEJM paper, though it can be longer. The virus is transmissible enough that the average sick patient, according to the paper, will infect about two others—enough to keep the outbreak going, but far less than could be expected of some viruses.Someone with measles, by contrast, can infect more than a dozen.

How is 2019-nCoV treated?

There are no specific treatments or vaccines for the virus, though researchers are working to expedite experimental therapies. A separate study published in the Lancet on Wednesday found that, of about 100 hospitalized patients in China treated for 2019-nCoV, many received therapies like antivirals and oxygen. About a third of the patients had been discharged by the time the study was written.

How long will the outbreak last?

It’s unclear. If SARS is any indication, the outbreak could drag on for months longer—although, Perl notes, the public-health response in China has been much faster this time around, which means the situation may be brought under control more effectively.

A state of quarantine may help limit the virus’ international spread, but Marrazzo says it could also mean the outbreak becomes more intense in the Wuhan area than it would otherwise. “You create a situation where getting supplies and human resources into the city can be really hard,” she says. “It just becomes logistically much more of a nightmare for the humanitarian aspect.”

Plus, a number of people traveled in and out of Wuhan before those restrictions were put in place, contributing to the disease’s geographic reach. One (non-peer-reviewed) paper posted online on Jan. 24 estimated that, even if travel in and out of Wuhan was reduced by 99%, it would only lower the number of infections outside the city by about 25%.

So far, the virus has turned up in 18 countries, though human-to-human transmission in those secondary locations seems limited. “In most instances, cases outside of China have been associated with travelers from China,” a CDC spokesperson confirmed for TIME. “The coming days and weeks are likely to bring more confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in the United States and globally, including some person-to-person spread in the United States, but the goal of the ongoing U.S. public health response is to contain this outbreak and prevent sustained spread of 2019-nCov in this country.”

Controlling the outbreak in China will undoubtedly be challenging, Marrazzo says, but she’s encouraged by the lack of escalation in other countries. “The longer we go not seeing those secondary transmissions, the more comfortable we can be that with careful infection prevention management and good public health practice, that we are going to be able to contain it,” she says. Common-sense practices like hand-washing and avoiding contact during an illness can go a long way, Marrazzo says.

Popular posts from this blog

New story in Health from Time: Here’s How Quickly Coronavirus Is Spreading in Your State

The novel coronavirus pandemic is a global crisis, a national emergency and a local nightmare. But while a great deal of the focus in the U.S. has been on the federal government’s response, widely criticized as slow and halting , the picture on the ground remains very different in different parts of the country. A TIME analysis of the per capita spread of the epidemic in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. found considerable range in the rate of contagion, and, in some parts of the country, a significant disparity compared to the national figure. The U.S., unlike nations such as South Korea and now Italy , has yet to show signs of bringing the runaway spread of the virus under control. However, while no single state is yet showing strong signs of bending the curve , some are faring much worse than others. The following graphic plots the rise in the total confirmed cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents in each state, plotted by the day that each state reported its first case.

New story in Health from Time: We Need to Take Care of the Growing Number of Long-term COVID-19 Patients

On July 7, 2020, the Boston Red Sox pitcher Eduardo Rodriguez tested positive for the new coronavirus. He was scheduled to start Opening Day for the Sox, but the virus had other plans— damaging Rodriguez’s heart and causing a condition called myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle). Now the previously fit 27-year old ace left-hander must sit out the 2020 season to recover. Rodriguez is not alone in having heart damage from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. In a new study done in Germany, researchers studied the hearts of 100 patients who had recently recovered from COVID-19. The findings were alarming: 78 patients had heart abnormalities, as shown by a special kind of imaging test that shows the heart’s structure (a cardiac MRI), and 60 had myocarditis. These patients were mostly young and previously healthy . Several had just returned from ski trips. While other studies have shown a lower rate of heart problems—for example, a study of 416 patients hosp

New story in Health from Time: What We Don’t Know About COVID-19 Can Hurt Us

Countries around the world have introduced stringent control measures to stop COVID-19 outbreaks growing, but now many find themselves facing the same situation again. From Melbourne to Miami, the relaxation of measures had led to increasing flare-ups, which in some places has already meant reclosing schools, businesses or travel routes. Within the U.S. and among different countries , places with wildly varying public-health policies have experienced wildly diverse outcomes. Most ominously, infections are rising rapidly in many places where they once were falling. So how do countries avoid an indefinite, unsustainable, cycle of opening and closing society? What is needed to prevent a future of strict social distancing and closed borders? To escape this limbo, we need to know more about each step in the chain of infection: why some people are more susceptible or have more symptoms, how our interactions and surroundings influence risk, and how we can curb the impact of the re