Skip to main content

New story in Health from Time: Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Shows Promise, Generating Positive Immune Responses in an Early Study



Earlier today, the biotech company Moderna reported positive results from a phase 1 study of its experimental COVID-19 vaccine, which was was among the first to begin testing in healthy human volunteers in mid-March.

The study, led by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the National Institutes of Health, involves 45 healthy people who received one of three different doses of the vaccine. According to Moderna, there are encouraging early signs that the shot generates antibodies against the COVID-19 virus, SARS-CoV-2, in levels that were similar to or higher than those seen in the plasma of people who recovered from infections.

The phase 1 study is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine—it is is focused primarily on safety. Nevertheless, the hints of efficacy emerging from the trial are encouraging. The level of antibodies seen in the participants show that the vaccine can attract and awaken the body’s immune response to mount a defense against SARS-CoV-2. The data also hinted that the higher doses prompted stronger immune responses.

In addition, the company reports that in a preliminary analysis, antibodies from eight of the participants (four given the low dose and four given the medium dose) appeared to neutralize the virus in the lab.

In the phase 1 study, the participants were all healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55 years. Those in the low- and medium-dose groups received two doses about a month apart, in order to properly prime the immune system for the most robust response. People in the highest dose group received only one inoculation. The results will likely be analyzed and reported in a scientific publication in coming weeks.

Based on these results, the phase 2 study, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared, will enroll around 600 healthy volunteers, will include just two doses—one that is slightly higher than the lowest dose, as well as the medium dose, since these appear to be sufficient to generate a relatively strong immune response. The company expects those trials to begin in June, and may include those at higher risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, such as health care workers. Those studies will determine which dose will be tested in the final, phase 3 studies that could begin as early as July. Based on the urgent need for a vaccine against COVID-19, on May 12 the FDA gave Moderna’s vaccine fast track status, which would expedite the regulatory agency’s review process.

These findings, though still early, are a validation of Moderna’s technology, which veers from the traditional vaccine design that generally depend on snippets of viral proteins or inactivated virus to activate the immune system. Moderna’s vaccine is made of mRNA from the virus, the genetic material that codes for proteins; after inoculation, it can prompt the body’s immune cells to recognize it as foreign and launch attacks against it. The company has been developing mRNA vaccines against a number of other disease, including respiratory syncytial virus, Zika and influenza.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

New story in Health from Time: Here’s How Quickly Coronavirus Is Spreading in Your State

The novel coronavirus pandemic is a global crisis, a national emergency and a local nightmare. But while a great deal of the focus in the U.S. has been on the federal government’s response, widely criticized as slow and halting , the picture on the ground remains very different in different parts of the country. A TIME analysis of the per capita spread of the epidemic in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. found considerable range in the rate of contagion, and, in some parts of the country, a significant disparity compared to the national figure. The U.S., unlike nations such as South Korea and now Italy , has yet to show signs of bringing the runaway spread of the virus under control. However, while no single state is yet showing strong signs of bending the curve , some are faring much worse than others. The following graphic plots the rise in the total confirmed cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents in each state, plotted by the day that each state reported its first case.
Read more

New story in Health from Time: We Need to Take Care of the Growing Number of Long-term COVID-19 Patients

On July 7, 2020, the Boston Red Sox pitcher Eduardo Rodriguez tested positive for the new coronavirus. He was scheduled to start Opening Day for the Sox, but the virus had other plans— damaging Rodriguez’s heart and causing a condition called myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle). Now the previously fit 27-year old ace left-hander must sit out the 2020 season to recover. Rodriguez is not alone in having heart damage from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. In a new study done in Germany, researchers studied the hearts of 100 patients who had recently recovered from COVID-19. The findings were alarming: 78 patients had heart abnormalities, as shown by a special kind of imaging test that shows the heart’s structure (a cardiac MRI), and 60 had myocarditis. These patients were mostly young and previously healthy . Several had just returned from ski trips. While other studies have shown a lower rate of heart problems—for example, a study of 416 patients hosp
Read more

New story in Health from Time: U.S. Inmates ‘Mistakenly’ Received COVID-19 Stimulus Checks. Now, the IRS Wants That Money Back

(BOISE, Idaho) — Hundreds of thousands of dollars in coronavirus relief payments have been sent to people incarcerated across the United States, and now the IRS is asking state officials to help claw back the cash that the federal tax agency says was mistakenly sent. The legislation authorizing the payments during the pandemic doesn’t specifically exclude jail or prison inmates, and the IRS has refused to say exactly what legal authority it has to retrieve the money. On its website, it points to the unrelated Social Security Act, which bars incarcerated people from receiving some types of old-age and survivor insurance benefit payments. “I can’t give you the legal basis. All I can tell you is this is the language the Treasury and ourselves have been using,” IRS spokesman Eric Smith said. “It’s just the same list as in the Social Security Act.” Read more: ‘A Double Whammy.’ Those Who Most Need The $1,200 Stimulus Checks May Wait the Longest To Get Them Tax attorney Kell
Read more